|
1
|
- Don’t believe everything you see on the big screen
|
|
2
|
- Movies make money telling stories
- Make a story people will be interested in
- Science Fiction
- The lure of the future
- Movies like: Armageddon, Mission to Mars, Red Planet, Star Wars,
Jurassic Park, The Core, etc…
|
|
3
|
- Science fiction extrapolates
- Starts from what we already know, and jumps into the “unknown”
- Problem is moviemakers often don’t have a very good grasp on where the
“unknown” starts
|
|
4
|
- So what happens in movies?
- Movies often use incorrect science to support their plot
- We expect movie plots to correctly portray already known science
- Some people leave the cinema believing the bad science in the movie is
correct
|
|
5
|
- Space noise
- Sinking starships
- Devices to increase viewing pleasure
- Laser guns
|
|
6
|
- Plot foundation:
- Texas sized asteroid
- Plant a bomb in the asteroid
|
|
7
|
- Texas sized asteroid?
- No asteroid in our solar system that large
- Largest asteroid is Ceres ~ 900km wide
- Texas ~ 1400km wide
- A comet wouldn’t have enough energy to knock it out of orbit
- If a comet ever even hit an asteroid
- Texas sized asteroid made of iron = hard to move
|
|
8
|
- No telescopes see the asteroid until it is 18 days away?
- oops. Big as Texas + 18 days * 22,000mph = VERY visible to the naked
eye
- Asteroid is jagged and spiky?
- Strength of gravity forms asteroids into spherical shapes
- Comet impact would melt some of the asteroid = even more smooth
|
|
9
|
- plant the bomb 800 feet deep to separate asteroid
- About as deep as the width of a human hair compared to a soccer ball =
not nearly deep enough
- Energy required >>> than energy of all the bombs on Earth.
Oops.
|
|
10
|
- Many other science errors in the movie
- I just touched on a few of the plot dependent ones
- For instance how the spaceships fly, how gravity affects objects
inconsistently, design of plot objects… it goes on
- Similar mistakes are made in many other movies as well
|
|
11
|
- Armageddon’s final Bad Science score
- On a scale from 0 to 10:
|
|
12
|
- -5
- Its bad, but not quite the worst I’ve ever seen. At least it didn’t try too hard to
pass itself off as highly scientific.
|
|
13
|
- Plot foundation:
- NASA sends astronauts to Mars
- NASA loses contact
- NASA sends second mission to
- find out what happened
|
|
14
|
- Rotating spacecraft?
- Conservation of angular momentum
|
|
15
|
- Puncture and freezing Dr. Pepper?
- Space is cold, but particles are few and far between
- Dr. Pepper has to radiate heat away = slow
- Low pressure of space would cause Dr. pepper to boil
- Meteoroids vaporize when they hit – wouldn’t puncture
|
|
16
|
- Jetpacks and unequal forces
- Need just as much force to stop as you do to accelerate
|
|
17
|
- Astronaut immediately freezes in space?
- After opening his helmet he dies immediately
- Takes a long time for a human to freeze in vacuum of space – longer
than in Earth’s atmosphere
- Would not die immediately ~ 14 seconds of consciousness, ~1 – 2
minutes before permanent damage or death
- You would definitely get a bad sunburn
|
|
18
|
- Long term low gravity exposure
- The movie tells us it will have adverse affects on the brain
- Oops. Astronauts and cosmonauts
are sane when they return to Earth after long stays
- Many more science problems in this movie, most dealing with biology
|
|
19
|
- Mission to Mars’ final Bad Science score
- On a scale from 0 to 10:
|
|
20
|
- -8
- This movie had NASA’s name all
over it, and still they botched nearly every use of science.
Disappointing.
|
|
21
|
- Plot foundation:
- Earth is dying – Mars is last hope
- We terraform Mars to make it habitable
- Terraforming goes wrong
- Team sent to Mars investigate
- I actually really liked this movie – it has a lot of good science
|
|
22
|
- We’ll start with the good
- Spaceship design
- “Every action has an equal and opposite reaction”
- Using fire extinguishers in zero-G
- Wait 40 minutes for an answer?
- Takes about 17 minutes travel time each way to
|
|
23
|
- On with the bad stuff
- Gamma ray burst fries ship electronics
- spaceships use radiation
shielded electronics that are safe from gamma rays. Doh
- High energy particles that come from solar flares could cause damage –
and harm astronauts
|
|
24
|
- Mars has a pink sky?
- Actually Mars’ sky is
- butterscotch colored due
- to dust particles
|
|
25
|
- Turning the gravity back on
- In the movie the ship commander falls immediately to the floor
- Actually… It won’t happen like that
- Using pathfinder’s modem
- Cute, but it has no batteries left, no ability to send voice, and the
range is far too low to reach orbit
|
|
26
|
- The Kosmos probe
- The astronaut reprograms the probe
- The unmanned probe has a display console?
- And an audio speaker??? what?
- Probes are programmed by radio
- Ship captain literally pulls the probe into the ship
- Intertia of the probe would be too great
|
|
27
|
- CPR in microgravity
- “Stand him up”
- There is no “up” in microgravity
- CPR is performed incorrectly
- Other common sense problems
- AIMEE still has a military mode. Whoops.
- “she must be on the dark side”
|
|
28
|
- Red Planet’s final Bad Science score
- On a scale from 0 to 10:
|
|
29
|
- 3
- There were actually a few good
uses of science in this movie.
And the mistakes they made weren’t really that bad.
|
|
30
|
- Whether you go to the movies or watch them at home…
- Keep in mind you can’t believe everything you watch
- Just a friendly warning though…
|
|
31
|
- Keeping your critical analysis skills sharp is great, but…
- Try not to correct the movie out loud when you’re watching it with other
people…
- They hate that. Or so my friends
tell me.
|