Introduction
Required Reading
Chapters 17 and 19
(See course calendar for optional sections.)
Review and Thought Questions
Ch. 17, p. 401: 1, 2
Ch. 19, p. 461: 1, 3, 5, 7, 10
|
|
At the turn of the century, the Milky Way was our
ENTIRE universe! Then came the
Shapley-Curtis Debate in 1920 that opened up the possibility that
the Milky Way was just one of many galaxies. The "spiral nebulae"
(as the galaxies were called then) were actually galaxies like ours, only
very distant. The question was resolved in the mid-1920's when
Edwin Hubble, using the 100-inch Hooker Telescope at Mt. Wilson, identified
Cepheid variable stars in the Andromeda Galaxy, M31.
The Shapley-Curtis debate makes
interesting reading even today. It is important, not only as a historical document, but a
lso as a glimpse into the reasoning
processes of eminent scientists engaged in a great controversy for which the evidence on
both sides is fragmentary and partly
faulty. This debate illustrates forcefully how tricky it is to pick one's way through the
treacherous ground that characterizes
research at the frontiers of science. Shu, F., 1982, The Physical Universe, An
Introduction to Astronomy, (University Science Books, Mill Valley, California) p. 286
Learning Objectives
After listening to the lecture, reading the text and these on-line notes, and
completing the lab assigned with this lesson, you should be able to:
- List characterizing features of spiral, barred spiral, lenticular, elliptical,
and irregular galaxies.
- State the evidence that collisions between spiral galaxies may form elliptical
galaxies.
- Briefly describe how the gravitational contraction of a protogalactic cloud
explains the different characteristics of the disk- and spheroidal-populations of
stars.
- Summarize the "nature" versus "nurture" arguments for why a galaxy ends up
being what it is.
- Explain what is meant by the "lookback time" and how we use this concept to
follow the evolution of galaxies.
Following Objectives are Optional (depending on the quarter):
- Explain what is meant by the Hubble Classification Scheme for galaxies
- Given an image of a galaxy, name its Hubble type.
- State how the star formation rate differs from an Sa to an Sc spiral galaxy.
- Explain why spiral arms are so prominent in spiral galaxies.
- Explain what is meant by the spiral arm "wind up conundrum."
- List some of the reasons why we think spiral galaxies form bars.
- Distinguish between disk-population stars and spheroidal-population stars
in terms of their ages, masses, colors, and orbits.
- Outline the major advances that have been made in our understanding of
galaxy formation and evolution through the research done with the Hubble Space
Telescope.
|
Terms you should know:
spiral galaxy
barred spiral
elliptical galaxy
irregular galaxy
spiral density wave
cannibal galaxies
dwarf elliptical
local group
cluster
supercluster
void
Hubble classification scheme
|
Concepts Covered
Classifying Galaxies
The method most commonly used to classify galaxies was instigated by
Edwin Hubble and is based on the
morphology of the galaxy.
Edwin Hubble's discovery of Cepheid variables in the
Andromeda Galaxy put to rest any discussion about the Milky Way being the "entire universe." At
the time, Hubble was also using the 100-inch Hooker telescope to take thousands of photographic
plates of the nebulous objects now known as galaxies. As biologists classify fauna, as paleontologists
seek the evolution of life through fossils, as our government seeks to gain the demographics of our
society through census, Hubble classified the galaxies based on how they looked so that he could hope
to get an insight as to their characteristics, their evolution, their numbers as a function of type.
A good deal of research, observations, and theory have been based upon understanding just why there
is a sequence.
With the deep field images of the Hubble Space Telescope, and with nearly a century of research since
the creation of the "Hubble Sequence," astronomers today question even the relevance of the sequence. The
diversity of galaxies both near and far is such that the categories are becoming more and more narrow.
One is hard-pressed to stack the galaxies into a few, orderly bins.
Having now questioned the basis, purpose, and relevance of the Hubble sequence, this lecture will
introduce you to the various types of galaxies and their defining characteristics. We need this
information as we go on to the second part of the lecture: the formation and evolution of galaxies.
Just as the classification of stars led us to understanding their birth, life, and death, the
Hubble sequence does hold clues to help us understand the birth, life, and death of the
galaxies that hold those stars. Reference: Sky & Telescope, May 2000
Types of Galaxies
Spiral Galaxies
- Formation and Evolution: spiral galaxies may have been the first to
form from
the huge clouds of material, clumps left in the overall structure of the universe.
As a cloud collapsed, it spun up. The rapid spin would force some of the material
onto a disk, much like the material in a protoplanetary disk. Initially, the stars
would all be made of just hydrogen and helium. The galaxy would become slowly
enriched as massive stars went supernova and spilled heavy elements back into the
interstellar medium.
- Milky Way Galaxy: fast or slow collapse? One of the pursuits of today's
study of the Milky Way is to determine if it underwent rapid or slow collapse. It
is a goal to understand how we got here. Astronomers look at the characteristics
of the globular clusters and the disk and bulge to help them solve the puzzle.
This question is not answered yet. Astronomers are also observing globular
clusters to see if maybe some of them are actually captured satellites.
- Relationship between "tightness of arms" and
"size of bulge": as you study the morphology of the various types
of spiral galaxies, look for a relationship between the tightness of the "winding
of the arms" and the size of the bulge. Yet another question: Why is there this
pattern? What is different about these spirals that produce such a range of
characteristics?
- Why aren't spiral galaxies "all wound up"? If the arms
were produced by the rotation of the galaxy, why aren't they tightly wound? The
stars at the Sun's distance from the center take about 230 million years to move
around the center of our galaxy, and our
galaxy is thought to be between 12 and 15 billion years old. A low-mass star,
having been around since the start, would have circled over 50 times. Surely the
galaxy would be as tight as a spring! But the Milky Way and other spirals are not
all wound up. Review the density-wave theory for a
possible solution to this conundrum.
- Spiral Arms: one reason why arms are so
noticeable in a spiral galaxy is that they trace massive, very luminous stars
that form and die quickly. Inter-arm space is filled with
old, low-mass, dim stars that live a long time. There are nearly as much matter
in between the arms as in them, but this matter is not nearly as luminous and
therefore not nearly as noticeable.
| Let's think of a down-to-Earth analogy. You are in a classroom having two
exit doors. The classroom is full. Your instructor turns out the lights,
asks you all to stand up,
spread yourselves in a circle, run through the classroom, out one door,
through the hall, and back in the other door. There are so many students that you
always jam up as you reach each door. Since you want to get around and finish this
silly game, you each get out your lighter and give the persons in front of you
hot-seats
to hurry them along. Now, the students are spread around evenly, but what
would an outsider, viewing this fiasco from above, really see?
|
Barred Spirals
- Formation and Evolution: barred spirals probably formed much like the
spirals, collapsing early on in the history of our universe. But why do barred
spirals have a "bar"? Do they contain much less massive halos? Is there a need to
transfer angular momentum from the bulge, and does the bar become an effective way
to transfer that angular momentum outwards? Some recent research has shown that
barred spirals have a higher central concentration of gas than unbarred spirals. Some
Astronomers believe that galaxies may alternate between a barred and an unbarred state;
tidal interactions form a bar and then the natural "self-destruction" blends it away.
Still another theory states that bars form either when two galaxies collide or when
they nearly miss each other as they drift through space.
- Star Formation: barred spirals are often great "nurseries for star
formation. Noticeably luminous regions are often seen at the ends of the bar.
Elliptical Galaxies
- Formation and Evolution: one of the many burning questions in
astronomy has been whether or not ellipticals are "Nature" or "Nurture." Did they
form from primordial clouds that perhaps did not have any overall rotational
motion? Did they form from mergers of spiral galaxies? Both? If both methods have
been present, do those ellipticals that formed initially differ in characteristics
from those that formed from mergers?
- Characteristics: ellipticals have no spiral arms. We may be
seeing the same overall shape (football) but just from different view points.
- Stars: ellipticals contain old, low-mass stars. They
have no free gas and dust to form new stars.
- Colors: ellipticals look reddish-orange because they are made up
of mostly old, low-mass stars. There is usually no current star formation, and no
excess gas and dust between the stars.
- Elliptical Sub-Types
- Cannibals (cD) (eating) the largest galaxies
- Dwarf Ellipticals (being eaten) the smallest galaxies
Lenticular (S0) Galaxies
- These are basically spiral galaxies without spiral structure.
- Interstellar matter has been all used up.
- Old population stars dominate these galaxies.
- Lenticular galaxies are of ften indistinguisable from ellipticals.
Irregular Galaxies
- Galaxies that don't fit anywhere else are tossed into the "irregular"
category.
- Peculiar shapes abound.
- These galaxies often look disturbed, distorted
- Unlike lenticulars, irregular galaxies are often places of rampant
star formation. A good example is a companion to our Milky Way -- the Large
Magellanic Cloud. It is thought that the LMC may be producing new, young
globular clusters (a bit of an oxymoron).
The Hubble Sequence of Galaxies
Take a closer look at the various classifications of galaxies, and then visit the
SEDS web sites to get more information and even more images for each of the galaxies.
Why is there a Hubble Sequence Anyway?
Good question, actually. In his article, "Beyond the Hubble Sequence" (Sky &
Telescope, May 2000), Professor Gregory Bothun addressed the meaning of the
classification scheme. Is it representing evolution? intrinsic physical properties?
formation?
At first, the sequence was thought to represent the evolution of
galaxies. While some thought that the order was from elliptical to spirals, others
thought that it was the opposite order (recall: 2 astronomers, 3 opinions). It
appears now, however, that the Hubble "tuning fork" is not any kind of temporal
evolution since galaxies across types are all approximately the same age. If one
takes into account star formation rates, one does see a pattern form with Sa
galaxies having low present-day formation rates and Sc having a higher star
formation rate. In this scenario, Sa galaxies would have used up the free
gas needed to form stars and star formation has decreased.
Consideration of intrinsic physical properties brings out 4 possibilities: the
galaxy's total mass, the mass of its bulge, its angular momentum, and the angular
momentum of its dark-matter halo. Bothun rules out the galaxy's total mass,
questions the bulge mass, and dismisses the angular momentum of the disk as possible
determinants of a galaxy's Hubble type. The investigation of the angular momentum
of the halo is still in its beginning stages. What is interesting about this theory,
however, is that the morphology of a galaxy is the result of something we cannot yet
detect, dark matter!
The formation of a galaxy and the environment in which it forms both seem to have an
effect on the type of galaxy we see today. The image at the right is taken from the
article by Bothun, and illustrates how an elliptical versus a spiral might form.
This is no doubt an over-simplified picture since galaxies are clustered and do not
form in isolation. With the strong evidence of mergers occurring at all epochs of
the universe, what a galaxy is today is a combination of "nature" and "nurture" --
how it was born and how it was "raised." One of the key insights made as to the
types of galaxies and the environment was that ellipticals dominate in high density
clusters while spirals dominate in low-density environments.
Bothun concluded that "...there is no one dominant physical mechanism that determines
the morphological properties of a galaxy. One overall idea has emerged, however: the
amount of gas left over after the formation of the first generation of stars is likely
the most important parameter guiding a galaxy's subsequent evolution. The problem
is that we just don't know what physical processes determine how much gas is left over
in the first place!"
Basic Galaxy Properties
| Trait |
Spiral/Barred Spiral Galaxies (S, SB) |
Elliptical Galaxies (E) |
Irregular Galaxies (Irr) |
| Shape and structural properties |
Highly flattened disk of stars and
gas, containing spiral arms and thick central bulge.
Sa and SBa galaxies have largest bulges, the least obvious
spiral structure, and roughly spherical stellar halos.
SB galaxies have an elongated central "bar" of stars and gas.
|
No disk.
Stars smoothly distributed through an ellipsoidal
volume ranging from nearly spherical (E0) to very flattened (E7) in shape.
No obvious substructure other than a dense central nucleus.
|
No obvious structure. Irr II galaxies often have "explosive"
appearance.
|
| Stellar content |
Disks contain both young and old stars; halos consist of old stars only.
|
Contain old stars only |
Contain both young and old stars. |
| Gas and dust |
Disks contain substantial amounts of gas and dust;
halos contain little of either. |
Contain little or no gas and dust. |
Very abundant in gas and dust. |
| Star formation |
Ongoing star formation in spiral arms. |
No significant star formation during the last 10 billion years. |
Vigorous ongoing star formation. |
| Stellar motion |
Gas and stars in disk move in circular orbits around the galactic
center; halo stars have random orbits in three dimensions.
|
Star have random orbits in three dimensions. |
Stars and gas have very irregular orbits. |
|
Galaxy Formation and Evolution
To some degree, the formation and evolution of galaxies were covered under each of the
individual topics above. Here we will take a look at what
astronomers' have to say about galaxy formation and evolution based upon
the images taken by the Hubble Space Telescope.
Galactic Building Blocks
 |
September 4, 1996
Photo No.: STScI-PRC96-29a
Embedded in this Hubble Space Telescope image of nearby and distant galaxies are
18 young galaxies or galactic building blocks, each containing dust, gas, and a few
billion stars. Each of these objects is 11 billion light-years from Earth and much
smaller than today's galaxies.
At this distance, the universe was only about 16 percent of its current age. The
18 young galaxies were found within an area about 2 million light-years across,
which is about the distance between our Milky Way and the Andromeda galaxy. Some
astronomers believe the young objects are the ancient building blocks of today's
galaxies, because they are close enough in space to eventually collide or merge
with each other. At 2,000 to 3,000 light-years across, each building block is larger
than a normal star cluster - as seen in our galaxy - but smaller than a present-day
galaxy, which typically is about 30,000 to 100,000 light-years wide. They are located
in a small region of sky in the northern part of the constellation Hercules, near
the border of Draco. The image covers a diameter that is 13 times smaller than that
of the full moon.
Hubble
Web Site where you should go to complete the discussion on the formation
of galaxies.
|
Galaxies in their Pre-Adolescent Years
 |
PHOTO CAPTION NO.: STScI-PRC94-39B
FOR RELEASE:JULY 24, 1995
This is a NASA Hubble Space Telescope image of a variety of galaxies
with irregular and peculiar shapes. These galaxies are so far away
that they are seen when the universe was a fraction of its current
age. The bright blue regions indicate a rapid episode of star
formation. Hubble reveals that these objects once far outnumbered
large galaxies like our Milky Way, but have faded or self-destructed by
today.
This image is part of a serendipitous sky survey which has been
conducted over the past three years by Professor Richard Griffiths and
colleagues at the Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, with a team
of astronomers in the United States and Britain.
The survey is one of the key projects for Hubble. Over the past three
years the deep survey has uncovered a bizarre variety of shapes and
structures in distant galaxies, which previously appeared as fuzzy
blobs from ground-based telescopes.
Credit: Richard Griffiths (JHU), The Medium Deep Survey Team, and NASA
Faint Irregular
Galaxies
|
Galaxies: Snapshots in Time (A Family Album?)
 |
PHOTO RELEASE NO.: STScI-PR94-52C
EMBARGOED UNTIL: 1:00PM (EST) DECEMBER 6, 1994
This sequence of NASA Hubble Space Telescope (HST) images of
remote galaxies offers tantalizing initial clues to the evolution of galaxies
in the universe.
[far left column]
These are traditional spiral and elliptical-shaped galaxies that make up
the two basic classes of island star cities that inhabit the universe we
see in our current epoch (14 billion years after the birth of the universe
in the Big Bang). Elliptical galaxies contain older stars, while spirals
have vigorous ongoing star formation in their dusty, pancake-shaped
disks.
Both galaxies in this column
are a few tens of millions of light-years away, and therefore represent
our current stage of the universe s evolution.
[center left column]
These galaxies existed in a rich cluster when the universe was
approximately two-thirds its present age. Elliptical galaxies (top)
appear fully evolved because they resemble today's descendants. By
contrast, some spirals have a frothier appearance, with loosely shaped
arms of young star formation. The spiral population appears more
disrupted due to a variety of possible dynamical effects that result
from dwelling in a dense cluster.
[center right column]
Distinctive spiral structure appears more vague and disrupted in
galaxies that existed when the universe was nearly one-third its present
age. These objects do not have the symmetry of current day spirals
and contain irregular lumps of starburst activity. However, even this far
back toward the beginning of time, the elliptical galaxy (top) is still
clearly recognizable. However, the distinction between ellipticals and
spirals grows less certain with increasing distance.
[far right column]
These extremely remote, primeval objects existed with the universe was
nearly one-tenth its current age. The distinction between spiral and
elliptical galaxies may well disappear at this early epoch. However, the
object in the top frame has the light profile of a mature elliptical galaxy.
This implies that ellipticals formed remarkably early in the universe
while spiral galaxies took much longer to form.
Credit: A. Dressler (Carnegie Institutions of Washington),
M. Dickinson (STScI), D. Macchetto (ESA/STScI), M. Giavalisco
(STScI), and NASA
Galaxies in the Young Universe
|
QUASARS: the Equivalent of the Teen-Age Years?
 |
Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD
Press RELEASE: 96-244
Two teams of astronomers are releasing dramatic Hubble
Space Telescope images today, which show that quasars live in
a remarkable variety of galaxies, many of which are violently
colliding. This complicated picture suggests there may be a
variety of mechanisms -- some quite subtle -- for "turning
on" quasars, the universe's most energetic objects.
The Hubble researchers are intrigued by the fact
that the quasars studied do not appear to have obviously
damaged the galaxies in which they live. This could mean
that quasars are relatively short-lived phenomena which many
galaxies, including the Milky Way, experienced long ago.
Discovered only 33 years ago, quasars are among the
most baffling objects in the universe because of their small
size and prodigious energy output. Quasars are not much
bigger than Earth's solar system but pour out 100 to 1,000
times as much light as an entire galaxy containing a hundred
billion stars.
A super massive black hole, gobbling up stars, gas and
dust, is theorized to be the "engine" powering a quasar.
Most astronomers agree an active black hole is the only
credible possibility that explains how quasars can be so
compact, variable and powerful. Nevertheless, conclusive
evidence has been elusive because quasars are so bright they
mask any details of the "environment" where they live.
|
Here's another multiple-choice quiz with instant feedback (note, not all questions are relevant
for every quarter):
Galaxies (Click on 'reload' if the first
question does not appear.)
Relevant Links
Last updated on:
|