| Lecture |
|
The Origin of Space, Time, and Matter
Icon reminds us that between 1 - 10% of the static on
our TV sets is due to the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation. |
Horrendous Space Kablooie
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The Horrendous Space Kablooie is an alternate term for the
big bang. It was coined by Bill Watterson,
creator of the comic strip
"Calvin and Hobbes."
In one strip, Calvin says to Hobbes, "I've been reading about the
beginning of the universe. They call it 'The Big Bang.' Isn't it
weird how scientists can imagine all the matter of the universe
exploding out of a dot smaller than the head of a pin, but they
can't come up with a more evocative name for it than 'the Big Bang'?
That's the whole problem with science. You've got a bunch of
empiricists
trying to describe things of unimaginable wonder."
Hobbes asks, "What would you call the creation of the universe?"
Calvin replies, "The Horrendous Space Kablooie!"
This term enjoyed a brief popularity in the scientific community
and was widely used in informal communications (often abbreviated to "the HSK").
Introduction
"Our minds are continuously preoccupied by an endless series of
everyday matters--from shoe tying to television watching.
Distraction and diversion might even be considered to play a basic
role in our culture; perhaps because beneath the flurry of practical
and incidental considerations lurk questions for which we have no
satisfactory answers-the kind of tantalizingly ominous,
even vaguely dangerous questions that break to the surface when one
is quietly gazing at a starry sky on a clear, dark, moonless
night. They are not small questions: What does it mean to exist in a
universe of incomprehensible size? Is the universe
perhaps infinite in space and time? If the universe evolves, are we
swept towards annihilation or eternity-what is the fate
of the universe? Such concerns are in a sense primordial: they have,
in some form, lain at the base of the brain for thousands
of generations...waiting. Stripped of romance these questions come
out like: What is the structure and evolution of the universe?
How does it work? How does it fit together? What is the underlying
order that explains the 'world'? These are the
questions of cosmology-the scheme of the universe as a whole."
From Professor Paul Boynton's "Cosmology: A Cosmic Perspective."
In this lesson we continue our pursuit of cosmology by studying the
very start of space and time--at least as we perceive it today.
Learning Objectives
After listening to the lecture, reading the text, and studying these on-line
notes,
you should be able to:
- Summarize how our views of the cosmos have basically changed over the
past 4000 years (!).
- Relate what particle physics has to do with the origin of the Universe.
- Describe what Calvin and Hobbes has to do with the origin of the Universe.
- Explain why the "Big Bang" theory is the most widely accepted theory
for the formation of the Universe at the present time, giving the two pieces
of evidence that imply a hot, dense origin.
- List and briefly describe the two theoretical frameworks for the Big
Bang theory.
- Explain what is meant by a homogeneous universe, an isotropic universe, and
a "homogeneous AND isotropic" universe. Give another way of saying that the
Universe is homogeneous and isotropic.
- Describe in extremely simple terms what is meant by "inflation of the
universe."
- Outline the first 5 eras of the Universe, placing them in chronological
order.
- State the significance of the discovery of the cosmic microwave background
radiation.
- Summarize completely the way the
equation--E=mc2--operated during the particle era.
- Discuss what is meant by the "decoupling era."
- Give a stellar analogy for the era of nucleosynthesis, era of nuclei, and
era of atoms.
- Explain how the observations of the cosmic abundances of hydrogen, helium,
and deuterium support the "Big Bang" theory.
|
Terms you should know:
cosmology
homogeneous universe
isotropic universe
inflation
cosmic microwave background radiation
decoupling
Planck era
GUT era
electroweak era
particle era
era of nucleosynthesis
era of nuclei
era of atoms
cosmological constant
singularity
symmetry breaking
matter and anti-matter
particles and anti-particles
cosmological redshift
|
Contents
Ancient Cosmologies
There have been a variety of cosmologies in the past, there are
different cosmologies today, and there will be different cosmologies
in the future. A short internet search for the definition of cosmology resulted
in the following:
"the study of the formation, structure and evolution of the universe
as a whole"; "a branch of metaphysics that deals with the nature
of the universe as an orderly system (Webster)"; "discourse concerned
with the cosmos and with cosmic questions"; "kosmos Greek for
universe and logica to speak -- to speak about the universe";
"the physics of the universe as a whole, everything"; "the study of
the universe and its creation as an ordered whole."
Naturally, our perception of just what constitutes the "universe" has
had to change. Thousands of years ago we did not have the technology
to explore the depths of the Universe as we do now. Humans were
concerned with surviving: When to plant crops, when would floods
come, when is winter just around the corner? There was a time when
we had the technology--in the form of a simple telescope--to change
our view of the Universe, but the strict religious dogma of the Church
prohibited it.
If we take just a small sample of past views of the Universe, we
should be able to get a summary of how our views of the cosmos have
basically changed.
 |
STONEHENGE:
Thought to have been built over a period of time by the Druids in
the present southern England. The stones of stonehenge are precisely
aligned to the solstices and equinoxes--the path of the Sun during the
year. It is also conjectured that it was used to follow the phases
of the Moon. |
 |
The goddess Nut of ancient Egypt. One notes the stars on her
body and her protection of the people and their animals and their
culture. |
 |
A Hindu concept of the Universe. The Earth is carried
by a
tortoise resting on the great serpent, the symbol of eternity. |
 |
This is supposedly from a 16th-century woodcut, although in the
book by Dr. E. C. Krupp, "Beyond the Blue Horizon," it is said to be probably
from a 19th century Frenchman. |
 |
Ptolemy's universe.
The explanation for the universe, which included a complex but
accurate-enough-for-the-times prediction of the motion of the planets,
survived for about 1500 years. Here the Earth is at the center, with
the Moon, Mercury, Venus, the Sun, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn all occupying
orbits around it. This configuration was not good enough to explain all of
the phenomena, and so additional circles called epicycles were imposed. When
these didn't work exactly right additional adjustments were made until the
model became accurate enough to predict planetary positions to within a few
degrees. |
 |
The Copernican Model. When observations could no longer be refuted (and
when Copernicus took radical exception to the model having moved away from
a perfect circle), the Sun was placed at the center of the solar system and
the Universe. Because Copernicus refused to move away from a perfect circle
for the orbits, this model was no more accurate in predicting planetary
positions than the erroneous one of Ptolemy. |
| For a wonderful discussion of ancient cosmologies, please
read
Program 01 from Prof. Paul Boynton's Cosmology: A
Cosmic Perspective (better yet, look for his course that uses this text) |
 |
| To fully understand the origin of the Universe, we would need to have a
fairly comprehensive knowledge of particle physics, and there is just no way.
But, it is possible to get a simplified introduction. You should read
Chapter S4 of your text, especially Sections S4.1 and S4.2, as that will
give you enough background for what we cover here. There are a couple of
web sites that I found that will also help should you want a slightly more
in-depth understanding:
|
The Cosmic Microwave Background
The Kiss of Death for Believers of a Steady-State Universe
The Discovery
- Einstein's Cosmological Constant (or as he put it, his greatest "blunder").
Einstein knew that the Universe would collapse in on itself if there were not
something to counteract the force of gravity. Since it was obvious this was
not happening, he put in a "fudge factor." Einstein felt that the universe
was static, a model called the "steady state universe."
- Friedmann (1922) and Lemaitre (1927) proposed a homogeneous and isotropic
universe with a positive cosmological constant and an expansion parameter.
Friedmann-Lemaitre Cosmological Model
- 1929: Hubble provided observational evidence for expansion in his discovery
paper. "The linear velocity-distance relation was set out in a discovery
paper in 1929, followed by a series of papers with Humason between 1931
and 1936 that verified and extended the relation to large (i.e. 60,000 km s[-1]
redshifts. This discovery lead to the notion of the expanding universe which
is the centre-piece (being the necessary condition) for the cosmological
models of the present day."
[
Edwin Hubble 1889-1953, JRASC, Vol. 83, No. 6, Dec. 1989]
- Even with this observational evidence, proponents of steady-state, static
universe held on (but probably not Einstein who was a contemporary of Hubble)
until a discovery was made that could be explain by nothing other than a hot
origin for the Universe.
- Penzias and Wilson discovered CMB. Go right to the source, Bell Labs,
and read about it:
Penzias and Wilson's Discovery is one of the Century's Key Advances
Characteristics of the CMB
- Originates in most distant reaches of universe
- Remnant radiation from an exceedingly hot, exceedingly young universe
- Expansion cooled the radiation to 3 degrees Kelvin
- Radiates as a blackbody
- Isotropic to 1 part in 100,000
- Comes from epoch of thermalization, the first year of the Universe
- 300,000 years after Big Bang matter and radiation "decoupled"
- Radiation at T = 3000 K cooled to 3 K by cosmic expansion
- Expected fluctuations detected by COBE in 1992
Theoretical Foundation
The theoretical foundations were 1) general relativity, where Einstein proposed
a new view of gravity; 2) the cosmological principle: When averaged over
extremely large regions, the Universe is homogeneous AND isotropic.
 |
 |
 |
| A homogeneous universe looks the same to all observers, but not necessarily
the same in all directions. In the above example, one could position an "X"
anywhere, and the "universe" would look the same. But, if one looked in one
direction, let's say "up," it is not the same as it looks if one looks "across."
|
An isotropic universe look the same in all directions. Here, though, one
needs to be at the middle of this "universe" to see the same view in all
directions. |
A homogeneous and isotropic universe looks the same to all observers and
in all directions. |
|
What is another way of saying that the Universe is homogeneous
and isotropic?
|
The First 3 Minutes of the Universe
The Standard Model
(Big Bang Theory)
First there was a grapefruit-sized singularity......
Then, the appearance of space and time "that occurred simultaneously everywhere."
After 3 minutes:
- temperature approximately 1 billion K
- density is about that of water
- heavier nuclei formed
Inventory of Universe at this Time:
- light
- neutrinos
- antineutrinos
- teeny-tiny amount of nuclear material
~ 75% H and ~25% He
"I cannot deny a feeling of unreality in writing about the first three
minutes as if we really know what we are talking about." (Weinberg)
(The following "time line" assumes a universe that is
20 billion years old.)
Time marches on. When the Universe has an age of:
10,000 years: Matter dominates
300,000 years: Universe becomes transparent at a
cosmological redsift, z = 1000
At this point in the evolution of the Universe,
the "smoking gun" is created, one that brings about
the consensus for standard model by the pressure
of empirical data:
- Weak radio static which fills the Universe -- the remnant
radiation from when matter and radiation set off on individual
paths
which, when combined with the
- Recession of distant galaxies
brings down hard evidence for a "Big Bang" (or, as Calvin and
Hobbs have renamed it -- "The Horrendous Space Kablooie")
1-2 billion: Galaxy Formation
3 billion: Galaxy Clustering
4 billion: Milky Way Galaxy collapses
4.1 billion: first stars form
(population III???)
5 billion: quasars are born; population II stars form
10 billion: population I stars form
15.2 billion: our parent interstellar cloud forms
15.3 billion: collapse of protosolar nebula
15.4 billion: planets form and terrestrial planets solidify
15.7 billion: intense cratering of planets
16.1 billion: oldest terrestrial rocks form
17 billion: microscopic life appears
19.99999999 billion years: You are born, grow up, and register
for Astronomy 101
The rest, as they say, is history.
Take the Quiz
Instant Response Multiple Choice Practice Exam from
the publishers of the text, emphasizing the information in your text.
Relevant Links:
- A Self-Reproducing
Inflationary Universe Recent versions of inflationary theory assert that
instead of being a single, expanding ball of fire described by the big bang
theory, the universe looks like a huge growing fractal. It consists of many
inflating balls that produce new balls, which in turn produce more new balls,
ad infinitum. Therefore the evolution of the universe has no end and may have
no beginning. After inflation the universe becomes divided into different
exponentially large domains inside which properties of elementary particles
and even dimension of space-time may be different. Thus, the new cosmological
theory leads to a considerable modification of the standard point of view on
the structure and evolution of the universe and on our own place in the world.
- An alternative explanation for the origin of our present-day universe:
An Ekpyrotic Universe
-
Cambridge Cosmology: Hot Big Bang
- Take a
COSMIC MYSTERY TOUR that will describe the origin of the universe
from a slightly different approach.
Last updated on: